Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 07:04
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Scientists stunned to see humpback whales trying to send messages to humans - BBC Wildlife Magazine
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How do online business networking groups compare to in-person ones?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Whitesides says budget proposal shows the administration does not value NASA science - SpaceNews
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Since the Brits can't steer their oil tanker, what makes them think they can take on Russia?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is the Philippines PH a poor 3rd world or 4th world country forever and forever?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Central Ohio woman battles severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - 10tv.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.